JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 22, 2003

A- de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Carlos Enrique Martinez Escallon

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Entidad del sector descentralizado por servicios del orden nacional
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se remitió el expediente de la referencia al Juzgado Séptimo Civil del Circuito de Cartagena, para que ejerciendo sus competencias constitucionales y legales, decida sobre la tutela del ciudadano de la referencia contra la Caja de Retiro de la Fuerzas Militares, toda vez que así lo dispone el primer inciso del numeral 1 del Art. 1° del Decreto 1382 de 2000.

La Sala señaló que la entidad demandada es una autoridad del orden nacional, descentralizada por servicios.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Remitir, por intermedio de Secretaria General, el expediente de la referencia al Juzgado
  2. Septimo. Civil del Circuito de Cartagena, para que, ejerciendo sus competencias constitucionales y legales, decida sobre la accion de tutela de Carlos Enrique Martinez Escallon contra la Caja de Retiro de la Fuerzas Militares.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.